<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Moolicious</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.theadventus.com/andy/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.theadventus.com/andy</link>
	<description>Just another TACian Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 22:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Javascript Libraries in the market and the trends by Tony</title>
		<link>http://blog.theadventus.com/andy/2009/03/31/hello-world/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 07:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2</guid>
		<description>i agree with wat u say abt jquery.

mootools actually good, but its not on top of my favorite coz it has less documentation/support, less examples, and less compatibility than jquery. the size of the library is significantly larger than jquery too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with wat u say abt jquery.</p>
<p>mootools actually good, but its not on top of my favorite coz it has less documentation/support, less examples, and less compatibility than jquery. the size of the library is significantly larger than jquery too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

