<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s IE 6 again&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.theadventus.com/mingyuan/2010/01/22/its-ie-6-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.theadventus.com/mingyuan/2010/01/22/its-ie-6-again/</link>
	<description>Just another TAC Blogs weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 23:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://blog.theadventus.com/mingyuan/2010/01/22/its-ie-6-again/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 05:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.theadventus.com/mingyuan/?p=22#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Hey, I don't think Microsoft is still supporting IE6. I think what they're fixing is how to make sure attacks that happen by utilizing IE6 do not damage other system (Windows, MSSQL, Active Directory, etc).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I don&#8217;t think Microsoft is still supporting IE6. I think what they&#8217;re fixing is how to make sure attacks that happen by utilizing IE6 do not damage other system (Windows, MSSQL, Active Directory, etc).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

